Is it really a plan if it is geared to be completed over 30 years or more? Which constituencies will ensure that the plan is implemented over such a long time frame? Be flexible with the design because it will most likely change over time. Make sure people are on board in every step of the process. Town halls and surveys are important for public opinion, but people often say things and act differently when they have to open their wallets. If the mayor wants families to put down lifelong roots, mass transit can be part of the solution. Young people without cars and senior citizens who have grown less comfortable driving would prefer an alternative way to get around. Integrating transit is the sustainable option for new development. Assessing the contributing value on a per acre basis, which he is doing, really shines a light on why increased density in this area could be a savior over time for the residents and their tax bills.ĭavid Reiss, Law Professor at Brooklyn Law School and Research Director of the Center for Urban Business Entrepreneurship (CUBE) says: Note: the mayor is absolutely right to look at maximizing the value of the land in the district.
This is call “form-based planning.” This could quicken the pace of the development. Create a vision for the form of the buildings on the parcels and allow the market to respond to which uses (residential, office, etc) will go there. Successful urban centers often have buildings that change use over time (from office to residential, for example). If possible, don’t get hung up on particular uses of individual land parcels. But, again, create the proper framework that will allow the city to achieve its vision and stick with it. There will be ebbs and flows in the development cycle. A framework for redevelopment that will allow the city to achieve the vision and then let private development create the actual development. Geoff Koski, Senior Real Estate Consultant at Bleakly Advisory Group and President of the Atlanta chapter of the Congress for the New Urbanism (CNU) says: So, we asked two experts in real estate and urban planning for tips.
#David reiss blog how to#
On Second Thought wondered if it would be beneficial to have a conversation about common mistakes made with big developments before plans are finalized and get some advice for John’s Creek on how to move forward. Generally, such large scale, mixed-use projects are discussed and debated and after construction begins, they’re often criticized heavily. Ellen Dunham-Jones, an architecture professor at Georgia Tech and co author of Retrofitting Suburbia, says that's in part because more communities want to attract a younger workforce. Similar walkable, urban developments are popping up all around the country. "Homeowners are disproportionately supporting the load by covering 81 percent of the tax digest versus 19 percent for commercial." Without doing something to change the current model, he says, there will be less money for public services like road repairs. "John's Creek does not have a healthy and sustainable tax digest," Bodker said in his most recent State of the City address. Bodker believes this project will broaden the city's tax base. John's Creek mayor Michael Bodker calls the redevelopment project "The District," referring to an area that would become the city's downtown sector. The city wants to transform some of its 728-acre office park into a town center with homes, shops and offices. It's fairly small - only about 80,000 people live there - but it has big dreams. John’s Creek is an affluent suburb in northeast Atlanta.
0 kommentar(er)
